[Fwd: [WARC] criticism of skywarn net saturady june 7, 2008]

Erik Brom ewbrom at hbci.com
Wed Jun 18 04:12:32 GMT 2008


And the game plan can change at any time.


At 10:01 PM 06/12/08, you wrote:
>Dan,
>
>Good point.  The EOC is our customer.  We need to provide the type 
>of information and detail they request.  It follows that net control 
>informs net participants of the "game plan" for a particular event 
>and enforces the plan.
>
>Thanks for the clarification.
>
>I'm learning....
>
>73,
>Len
>
>Dr. Daniel L. Goltz wrote:
>>
>>Thanks for your comments.  Under the circumstances, "water levels 
>>normal", "no run off", "no mudslides" etc. were very useful 
>>reports. They helped to determing the scope and location of the 
>>problems we were dealing with.  I think it is nearly impossible to 
>>give a blanket statement of what is appropriate to report for any 
>>given event. It is up to net control or the EOC to help provide 
>>guidance to the people in the field as to what to report at any 
>>given time.  At the EOC we asked LSE WX what they wanted us to 
>>report to them so as not to over burden them with unwanted reports.
>>Thanks to all for participating.
>>
>>Dan, WK0W
>>
>>Quoting James Jarvis <jj at aprsworld.com>:
>_______________________________________________
>WARC mailing list
>WARC at lists.w0ne.org
>http://lists.w0ne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/warc



More information about the WARC mailing list