[From nobody Mon Apr 27 13:27:11 2009
Return-Path: <nate@natetech.com>
X-Original-To: jarvis@jarviscomputer.com
Delivered-To: jarvis@jarviscomputer.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by faye.voxel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8D232517C2
	for <jarvis@jarviscomputer.com>; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:59:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from faye.voxel.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (faye.lga6.us.voxel.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with LMTP id ulmWEZScT8Y2 for <jarvis@jarviscomputer.com>;
	Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:59:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com
	[66.111.4.27]) by faye.voxel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2584325179B
	for <jarvis@jarviscomputer.com>; Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:59:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41])
	by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9E932294C;
	Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:59:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161])
	by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:59:55 -0400
X-Sasl-enc: bkt4bvgboX0V+nes7I3hFR8yI8O6ZFK2UVC5G0gpJJbS 1240801195
Received: from [192.168.1.70] (unknown [75.148.36.30])
	by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B57C24BEA;
	Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:59:55 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: debian-hams@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <5D7D4A94-F7F1-4172-AD86-CF877A92A7E5@natetech.com>
From: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
To: Clare Jarvis <jarvis@jarviscomputer.com>
In-Reply-To: <200904262117.45405.jarvis@jarviscomputer.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=US-ASCII;
  format=flowed;
  delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Subject: Re: TCP/IP via Ham readio?
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:59:53 -0600
References: <200904262117.45405.jarvis@jarviscomputer.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
X-Bogosity: Unsure, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.520000, version=1.1.5
X-UID: 

Most of the people I've met doing this aren't doing it on the ham  
bands.  They're doing it with surplus Wireless ISP (WISP) gear, like  
Motorola Canopy or Trango Wireless unlicensed 2.4, 5.3, 5.8 GHz  
equipment.

I've personally seen a 21 mile shot done with Canopy gear for a  
temporary IP link to a tower site for a couple of weeks.  Works well,  
and anyone who can aim an antenna can do it.

Hams can't really "compete" in bandwidth or usefulness, unfortunately,  
since we can't carry commercial content, can't encrypt the traffic, etc.

Nate WY0X

On Apr 26, 2009, at 8:17 PM, Clare Jarvis wrote:

> Is anybody working the last mile problem of getting tcp/ip into an  
> emergency
> location over mediam speed connection via amateur radio.
>
> say 19K to 44K baud on uhf either half or full duplex?
>
> 73 de K0ny
>
>
> -- 
> Mr. Clare Jarvis
> President, Jarvis Computer Software
> PO Box 1264
> Winona, MN 5598707264
>
> (507) 454-2575
>
>
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-hams-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>

--
Nate Duehr
nate@natetech.com




]